To get a 40% discount on the price of Science Fraud, the book, available from Curtis Press. Go to Curtis Press and simply use the code suttonsites24 for a 40% discount on this book.
I am delighted to see the importance of the Spinach Supermyth, which I (Dr Mike Sutton) discovered in 2009, is now positively affirmed as a problem in the British medical Journal in 2023. The free PDF of that important article is available to download HERE
The "Museum Industry" is incredibly corrupt. They employ pseudo-scientific curators to mis-sell stories to the public in order to pay for their erroneous exhibits.
The Smithsonian is just one culprit. They are fact denying to keep alive the Wright Brothers story that is in fact completely demolished by empirical data they refuse to deal with. Check it all out in this superb documentary "First Flight" HERE .
Watch the video then read the fact denial nonsense written by so many Wright Brother superfans.
We see this empirical fact denial behaviour all the time when it busts beloved myths,
Brain J. Ford on the Sonia Poulton show in January 2022
When I contacted Professor Brian Ford to let him know that my "Selby cited Matthew discovery" research had twice been plagiarised in the Biological Journal of the Linnean Society it was me to who Brian responded with what he says in the above the video.
"If you’re in the public eye and you make an impression, people are going to steal your work. It's actually the ultimate compliment. If in science you haven't been plagiarised, it's because you haven't done anything decent. The minute you do, some miserable two-faced, dishonest bastard is going to come along and steal your work and claim it's his own."
In this programme Professor Brian Ford, on a broadcast show hosted by Sonia Poulton and Sean Ward provides us with the perfect quote on plagiarism. It should become a renowned quote, just so long as it is not plagiarised and attributed to another person. To try to prevent that happening I have added this video and his words on plagiarism to his page on PatrickMatthew.com - a website all about the worlds greatest science fraud by plagiarism. If you read Brian's book "Nonscience" you will find quite a bit about plagiarism, including Darwin's plagiarism of Patrick Matthew.
Incidentally, an "expert" in Latin and etymology will tell you "The word plagiarism has a curious history. It is derived from the Latin plagiarius—literally, a kidnapper who ensnares children or slaves in a plaga (net)."
Good grief! Were such people with their nets just like the evil Child Catcher form Chitty Chitty Bang Bang?
Someone like me can tell you that I found that Latin route of plagiarism information on the Internet and, having studied the topic just a bit, I know it's correct. What does this tell us about experts? Either way, if I ever definitely need heart or brain surgery for an expertly verifiable fact, I think I will go to an "expert" to perform the surgery rather than ask Brian to do it on his kitchen table. That said, an "expert" surgeon wanted to give my wife an operation to remove fibroids, that carried a 50% chance of rendering her "sterile" so she could increase her chances of conceiving a child. As a non-expert on surgery I thought about it and said we would defer our decision and try to conceive for another year. No surgery was required (with no 50:50 chance of it going wrong and additional risks of death from the anaesthetic etc etc). We now have a daughter. Conclusion = Brian has a point, but his book is satirical and so everything in it should not be taken literally. Reality is often (not always) more nuanced than this programme lets on. But then that's entertainment folks! So being most entertaining carries risks. I don't know, perhaps we should ask Donald Trump and Boris Johnson about that one? But would they tell us the truth? And if they didn't, would their millions of adoring fans care?
The cover of my forthcoming book is actually green.
If you see a red cover then you almost certainly have the red mist of anger. Perhaps you are angry at the fact you have been duped all these years by the Darwin Industry? Or perhaps you are one of the Darwinite horde suffering from new data hater syndrome?
There is only one cure. Buy my book and be inoculated against lies and other total nonsense about Charles' Darwin's genius originality. He was little more than a serial lying apex plagiarist.
This book relies entirely on what Professor Michael Streven's calls the "Iron Rule" of science, namely empirical facts, and new BigData unearthed ones at that, to prove beyond all reasonable doubt that Charles Darwin and Alfred Wallace plagiarised the theory of evolution by natural selection from Patrick Matthew.
Science Fraud: Darwin’s Plagiarism of Patrick Matthew’s Theory by Mike Sutton.
"Science Fraud" reveals how malicious New Data hater Darwin superfans and others, facilitated by members of the Darwin Industry, have committed repeat research plagiarism, tried multiple times without success to have the author fired from a senior academic position, and spread misinformation via Wikipedia and elsewhere in an attempt to re-bury the cast iron bombshell New Data on Darwin's and Wallace's plagiarism and associated lies.
PUBLICATION DATE 12 FEBRUARY 2022 - INTERNATIONAL DARWIN DAY!
.
SCIENCE FRAUD: DARWINS PLAGIARISM OF PATTICK MATTHEW'S THEORY ... A telling snippet from Emma Darwin to Patrick Matthew about Matthew's theory of the natural process of selection ... "... He is more faithful to your own original child than you are yourself ..." pic.twitter.com/WCBRSrYlyD
— Neil Shuttlewood, publisher with Curtis Press (@CurtisPress_) December 18, 2021
A must read for all those who want to tell what is real from fake and who understand exactly why doing so is important. Here
I love this book. A superb allegorical true account that resonates with all those wishing to know the importance of telling what is real from what is fake and why so many people cannot, or do not care to, distinguish.
The best analogy for Darwin's plagiarising science fraud of Patrick Matthew's prior published complete theory:
"Darwin, the amateur fiddler, is playing a cheap violin before a dead microphone whilst blasting out a recording of Matthew's wonderfully original prior-performance."
Kopi Luwak is coffee that has been selected by Palm Civets. Hanging around coffee plantations these little mammals pick out the choicest coffee berries and then poo out the beans. These beans are said to make the world's best coffee due to two factors (1) the coffee berries were the very best and chosen at the very best point of ripeness and (2) the digestive juices of the Civet.
The coffee demonstrated is supplied by Monkey Business, who personally assured me that the coffee is selected in the wild only and not from caged civets. We can only hope that is 100% true. I hope so. But I don't know. What I do know is that it's really expensive! But boy does it taste good too!
My youngest daughter Eleena (aged 12) scripted, directed, filmed, produced and edited this little instructional video.
The Royal Society of London has for years smogged some scientists and the wider public with a vast array of alternate reality falsehoods and utter lies. It is surely time to drag this lot over the coals for their pseudo scholarly shenanigans https://t.co/Olw0vQAhZf
No wonder the world is in such a mess. We seriously need to teach critical thinking skills in our schools and universities
Imagine why millions of people in USA believe Trump's deadly serial lying, why so many in the UK voted the serial liar & lethal incompetent Boris Johnson to into office. When our universities teach RAT as a "theory" when it's just tautological gibberish https://t.co/hga3CR7q9ypic.twitter.com/WmUB8vMYeO
2. He lacks proper rational critical thinking abilities, due to being raised by a father who thinks claiming critics can't spell Pinocchio is a rational argument that they are wrong to call his son a liar for lying. https://t.co/tVubOP0Tlk
3. He is an idiot alternative reality delusional and unhinged Right Wing racist Conservative mass entertainment clown who, like Trump, thinks lies and falsehoods that he wishes are true are true and that truth he does not like is a lie. And the credulous mass media enabled him pic.twitter.com/ucMtCW018d
On the cults of serial liar racists Trump and Darwin
How did serial liar racist Trump mislead over 70 million US citizens in the 21st Century? In the same way the even worse racist Darwin lied about his theft of the entire theory of evolution by natural selection and attracted an even larger cult following https://t.co/RKbJV7ogAUhttps://t.co/Mva8hdmuku
Darwinite cult alternate reality based on lies and mass deception of the scientific community. Get the independently verifiable facts. See the images below as 100% proof of Charles Darwin's lies about the theory he stole and then called his ownhttps://t.co/Cqp2XgJAGHpic.twitter.com/qBZThsHpFp
Archive Dysology for History before its perpetrators delete it: The case of Donald Trump and his lethal vaccination worrying. Trump's deadly Twitter account is suspended (hopefully forever). But his lethal lunatic antivaxxer tweets are archived forever.https://t.co/Slff4nvIpgpic.twitter.com/kzYVLP5Iob
Twitter deleted Trump's account. That's why it's essential we archive social media so future generations can learn mistakes of history & other things about what happened this century.
"So, it was you who played a pivotal role in spreading the #Covid19 pandemic lethal supermyth that masks actually spread Covid19? But why not save tens of thousands of lives now and apologise? Admit you are a lethal idiot!
Thinking about artificial and natural selection (those who are familiar with my research will know I have written much on that subject regarding who originated the theory of macroevolution by natural selection and who plagiarised it, If not, see my website PatrickMatthew.com for the shocking independently verifiable truth on that topic).
Relatedly (well, sort of), today I purchased some civet coffee for part of my son's Xmas present.
.
I bought it from Amazon and then researched the issue and found I needed to ask some questions of the supplier, having just realised I might have been facilitating a demand for animal cruelty. Check out this article from National Geographic on that https://archive.is/nrG8L See quote form that article imaged below.
The supplier of the coffee I bought is Monkey Business Coffee. I contacted Monkey Business Coffee and the images below show our conversation. What they told me in December 2020 reflects what they said elsewhere:
"We import our coffee from wild, ethically-produced Kopi Luwak plantations in Indonesia to our business premises in Bristol. ‘Ethically-produced’ means that we have a strict and independently verified commitment from the plantations that all Kopi Luwak coffee is foraged from the natural environment of the Asian Palm Civets, who do the picking and eating of our Kopi Luwak coffee beans.
This commitment results in the protection of this beautiful species, supporting local jobs in Indonesia and ensures our Kopi Luwak coffee is the most delicious available.
(Q) How did you go about selecting your suppliers to make sure they followed ethical practices?
"We actually travelled to Indonesia originally to meet with wild sourced Kopi Luwak plantations, ensuring they followed the agreed ethical standards and that all our received Kopi Luwak is sourced only from wild Asian Palm Civets. We also work with local agents and contacts within the Indonesian coffee industry to ensure these commitments are continually abided by." (archived source)
What worries me is that despite what the supplier says the coffee I bought does not publish the "wild and totally unfarmed/uncaged" claim on its website. Why not? Maybe ask National Geographic.
So if what they tell me and others is veracious, and I have no solid reason to suspect it is not in their specific case, you can buy civet coffee and drink it in their supplied to me "knowledge" that it is more likely than not something that really has been "naturally selected" by civets in the wild. I do hope so. But how can I be sure? They don't say it's form wild civets on the their website or where they are selling it on Amazon. They simply say it is ethically sourced. But that label normally means ethical to farmers. Worrying articles (archived) on the issue of cruelty and this coffee when the coffee is being "artificially selected" via civet captivity below:
I hope so too. How can we know? That question is bothersome. Just deleted original tweet out of embarrassment for having misspelled their little names. Put civet coffee information and two archived articles on cruelty in this business on my #Dysology bloghttps://t.co/66OoakU4Xqpic.twitter.com/NKRwXL3VQY
Also, even if humans are gathering wild civet poop from the wild for our coffee wouldn't that interfere with the natural selection process regarding what coffee plants grow where with the benefit of civet fertilizer, and would it it not then follow that such human gathering would interfere down the line - by a kind of artificial selection in the wild - with the civet's selection of coffee growing in the wild? Maybe not, seeing as the coffee they eat, apparently, comes from the coffee plantations they raid.
